Findings presented at AAD26 highlight rapid onset and deepening responses through week 24
By Dermsquared Editorial Team | May 04, 2026
Mona Shahriari, MD, reviews Phase 3 ONWARD data for envudeucitinib, including PASI 75/90/100 outcomes and key safety observations
In this News Alert, Mona Shahriari, MD, reviews Phase 3 data from the ONWARD1 and ONWARD2 trials evaluating envudeucitinib (ESK-001) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The discussion is based on a poster presented at the 2026 American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting.
Reframing oral therapy in the biologic era
Biologic therapies have redefined expectations in psoriasis, particularly around the degree and consistency of skin clearance. Within that context, newer oral agents are increasingly being evaluated not just for convenience or tolerability, but for their ability to approach biologic-level outcomes.
Dr Shahriari positions the ONWARD program within this shift, noting that the bar for oral therapies has changed. The question is no longer whether an oral agent is “good enough,” but whether it can deliver meaningful efficacy in a landscape shaped by highly effective injectables.
Mechanism and early clinical experience
Envudeucitinib is a next-generation, highly selective allosteric TYK2 inhibitor targeting IL-23, IL-12, and type 1 interferon signaling pathways central to psoriasis pathogenesis. Its design aims to maintain consistent TYK2 inhibition over a 24-hour period, which may contribute to its clinical activity.
Earlier Phase 2 data from the STRIDE program demonstrated relatively rapid skin clearance with sustained efficacy through one year, alongside a safety profile aligned with selective TYK2 inhibition rather than broader JAK pathway effects. These findings supported progression into the Phase 3 ONWARD trials.
ONWARD trial design
ONWARD1 and ONWARD2 were randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator–controlled trials enrolling patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Participants were assigned to envudeucitinib 40 mg twice daily, placebo, or apremilast.
The coprimary endpoints at week 16 were achievement of PASI 75 and an sPGA score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear).
Efficacy outcomes
As early as week 16, envudeucitinib demonstrated statistically significant improvements versus both placebo and apremilast across primary and secondary endpoints:
Responses continued to deepen through week 24:
Notably, response curves had not plateaued at week 24, suggesting the potential for continued improvement with ongoing therapy. In terms of onset, separation from placebo was observed by week 4, with some patients demonstrating visible improvement as early as week 2.
Taken together, these data point to a combination of relatively rapid onset, increasing efficacy over time, and substantial depth of response.
High-impact areas and patient-reported outcomes
The trials also evaluated outcomes in high-impact anatomical sites and patient-reported measures:
These findings highlight the importance of assessing disease burden beyond total body surface area, particularly in patients with involvement of functionally or socially sensitive sites.
Safety and tolerability
The safety profile in ONWARD was consistent with prior studies, with no new safety signals identified. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with the most commonly reported adverse events including nasopharyngitis, headache, and upper respiratory tract infections.
There were no reported signals for major adverse cardiovascular events, tuberculosis reactivation, or clinically meaningful hematologic, metabolic, or lipid abnormalities in the available data.
Clinical perspective
Dr Shahriari notes that these data contribute to an ongoing shift in how oral therapies are positioned in psoriasis management. Rather than being viewed as a step below biologics, certain oral agents may begin to approach comparable levels of efficacy in select patients.
She highlights potential relevance for patients who prefer oral therapy, those hesitant to initiate injectables, and individuals with limited body surface area involvement but significant disease burden in high-impact areas. At the same time, she emphasizes the need for longer-term data, comparative studies, and further evaluation in broader patient populations.
Key takeaways